
A new look
at the early solar system introduces an alternative to a long-taught,
but largely discredited, theory that seeks to explain how biomolecules
were once able to form inside of asteroids. In place of the outdated
theory, researchers propose a new theory -- based on a richer, more
accurate image of magnetic fields and solar winds in the early solar
system, and a mechanism known as multi-fluid magneto-hydrodynamics -- to
explain the ancient heating of the asteroid belt. (Credit:
NASA/JPL-Caltech)
Oct. 1, 2013 — A new look at
the early solar system introduces an alternative to a long-taught, but
largely discredited, theory that seeks to explain how biomolecules were
once able to form inside of asteroids. In place of the outdated theory,
researchers at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute propose a new theory --
based on a richer, more accurate image of magnetic fields and solar
winds in the early solar system, and a mechanism known as multi-fluid
magneto-hydrodynamics -- to explain the ancient heating of the asteroid
belt.
Although today the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter is cold and
dry, scientists have long known that warm, wet conditions, suitable to
formation of some biomolecules, the building blocks of life, once
prevailed. Traces of bio-molecules found inside meteorites -- which
originated in the asteroid belt -could only have formed in the presence
of warmth and moisture. One theory of the origin of life proposes that
some of the biomolecules that formed on asteroids may have reached the
surfaces of planets, and contributed to the origin of life as we know
it.
"The early sun was actually dimmer than the sun today, so in terms of
sunlight, the asteroid belt would have been even colder than it is now.
And yet we know that some asteroids were heated to the temperature of
liquid water, the 'goldilocks zone,' which enabled some of these
interesting biomolecules to form," said Wayne Roberge, a professor of
physics within the School of Science at Rensselaer, and member of the
New York Center for Astrobiology, who co-authored a paper on the subject
with Ray Menzel, a graduate student in physics. "Here's the question:
How could that have happened? How could that environment have existed
inside an asteroid?"
In the paper, titled "Reexamination of Induction Heating of Primitive Bodies in Protoplanetary Disks" and published today in
The Astrophysical Journal,
Menzel and Roberge revisit and refute one of two theories proposed
decades ago to explain how asteroids could have been heated in the early
solar system. Both of the established theories -- one involving the
same radioactive process that heats the interior of Earth, and the other
involving the interaction of plasma (super-heated gases that behave
somewhat like fluids) and a magnetic field -- are still taught to
students of astrobiology. Although radioactive heating of asteroids was
undoubtedly important, current models of radioactive heating make some
predictions about temperatures in the asteroid belt that are
inconsistent with observations.
Motivated by this, Roberge and Menzel reviewed the second of the two
theories, which is based on an early assessment of the young sun and the
premise that an object moving through a magnetic field will experience
an electric field. According to this theory, as an asteroid moves
through the magnetic field of the solar system, it will experience an
electric field, which will in turn push electrical currents through the
asteroid, heating the asteroid in the same way that electrical currents
heat the wires in a toaster.
"It's a very clever idea, and the mechanism is viable, but the
problem is that they made a subtle error in how it should be applied,
and that's what we correct in this paper," said Roberge. "In our work,
we correct the physics, and also apply it to a more modern understanding
of the young solar system."
Menzel said the researchers have now definitively refuted the established theory.
"The mechanism requires some extreme assumptions about the young
solar system," Menzel said. "They assumed some things about what the
young sun was doing which are just not believed to be true today. For
example, the young sun would have had to produce a powerful solar wind
which blew past the asteroids, and that's just no longer believed to be
true."
The solar wind, and the plasma stream it produced, was not as
powerful as early theorists assumed, and the researchers have corrected
those calculations based on the current understanding of the young sun.
Roberge said the early theorists also incorrectly calculated the
position of the electric field asteroids would have experienced. Roberge
said that, in reality, an electric field would have permeated the
asteroid and the space around it, a mistake very few researchers would
have realized.
"We've calculated the electric field everywhere, including the
interior of the asteroid," Roberge said. "How that electric field comes
about is a very specialized thing; about 10 people in the world study
that kind of physics. Fortunately, two of them are here at RPI working
together."
What emerges, Menzel and Roberge said, is a new possibility, based on
the corrected understanding of the electric fields the asteroids would
have experienced, the solar wind and plasma conditions that would have
prevailed, and a mechanism known as multi-fluid magneto-hydrodynamics.
Magneto-hydrodynamics is the study of how charged fluids -- including
plasmas -- interact with magnetic fields. The magnetic fields can
influence the motion of the charged fluid, or plasma, and vice versa.
Magneto-hydrodynamics had a moment of fame as the propulsion system for
an experimental nuclear submarine in the 1990 movie
The Hunt for Red October.
Multi-fluid magneto-hydrodynamics are an even more specialized
variation of the mechanism that apply in situations where the plasma is
very weakly ionized, and the neutral particles behave distinctly from
the charged particles.
"The neutral particles interact with the charged particles by
friction," Menzel said. "So this creates a complex problem of treating
the dynamics of the neutral gas and allowing for the presence of the
small number of charged particles interacting with the magnetic field."
Menzel and Roberge said their new theory is promising, but it raises many questions that merit further exploration.
"We're just at the beginning of this. It would be wrong to assert
that we've solved this problem," Roberge said. "What we've done is to
introduce a new idea. But through observations and theoretical work, we
know have a pretty good paradigm."
And much as Menzel and Roberge benefited from recent progress in
understanding the physical conditions in an emerging planetary system,
they hope their own work will advance the field of astrophysics.
"There are a lot of byproducts of this work because, in the course of
doing this, we had to really zero in on how an asteroid interacts with
the plasma of the young solar system," said Roberge. "There are a lot of
physical processes that we had to consider that have not been
considered in this context before